For a fuller explanation of this map and its significance, read my testimony, linked below. Click on map for a larger view.
I was going to write a Magnus Opus about the successful legal challenges to what the Hawaii Reapportionment Commission had called, in a moment of optimism, its “Final Plan.”
I worked with a lot of residents from all the counties, Democrats and Republicans both, who opposed this plan to artificially inflate Oahu’s population by counting non-resident military personnel, their dependents and non-resident college students. Through a lot of emails, conference calls, research and “talk story,” we managed to get the job done. Obviously, thanks is owed the attorneys who stepped forward, Stan Roehrig, Bob Kim and Michael Matsukawa. (I hope they can get compensated by the state for their legal expenses). And behind the attorneys was a mini-army of networked, and often frustrated, volunteer citizen activists. In my opinion, the quiet heroes, the citizen activists who started the resistance to this plan, are couples of Maui Republicans, former State Senator Fred Rohlfing and the former Mayor of Thousand Oaks, California, Madge Schaefer. Both are members of the Maui Reapportionment Advisory Council. They started pushing back against the plan with one hand while trying to rouse the Big Island residents from slumber with their other.
Ian Lind wrote a blog post about the Court’s ruling. I posted a lengthy comment there. I urge people to read the entries on his blog and join in the conversation by posting your own thoughts. Also Andy Parx of Kauai offers his perspective on the ruling on his blog, “Got Windmills?”.
Robert Thomas live-blogged oral arguments at the Hawaii Supreme Court. You can read the archived transcript on his blog, Inverse Condemnation. Great technology! Thanks, Robert.
I have posted a link to my September 19th testimony to the Commission. It provides a good, easy to digest, overview of arguments some of were making to warn the Commission from veering so far off course. When the Court repeated some of the same arguments, the Commission finally listened.
Bart Dame testimony, 9-19-11: Click here!
Here’s a link to Ian Lind’s blog post (Ian has a link to the Court ruling):
Andy Parx’s blog:
Inverse Condemnation’s Live blog and audio recording of the Supreme Court oral arguments: